Post by RAJ- on Jun 6, 2006 8:55:57 GMT 8
tis a fake!
proof:
1) upon magnification, the creatures pixel count is much higher then the background (ie. cropped from a different source)
2) the creature has light shing upwards from below and highlighting all the details, if it was a real pic, this creature should have lighted wings but anly a dark underpart due to the light coming down from te sun..
3) nightvision?? wtf is this guy talking about, its pretty obvious that its a morning shot.. (the plants even have shadows.. XD)
4) lastly, judging from the distance from it to the tree in the background and the gouse in the foreground, said creature should be atleast 50feet big to appear that large in such a far perspective...
JUST MY %dollars worth..
d**n moronic hoaxers..
proof:
1) upon magnification, the creatures pixel count is much higher then the background (ie. cropped from a different source)
2) the creature has light shing upwards from below and highlighting all the details, if it was a real pic, this creature should have lighted wings but anly a dark underpart due to the light coming down from te sun..
3) nightvision?? wtf is this guy talking about, its pretty obvious that its a morning shot.. (the plants even have shadows.. XD)
4) lastly, judging from the distance from it to the tree in the background and the gouse in the foreground, said creature should be atleast 50feet big to appear that large in such a far perspective...
JUST MY %dollars worth..
d**n moronic hoaxers..
keeping the site active as a place to dump info for easier backtracking. 